Is userbenchmark reliable. The situation with UserBenchmark is stupid.

Is userbenchmark reliable 14 and the SkyHawk (2016), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. net seems to be the best website I've found that compares CPU performance from some older CPU's as well as the newer however, their website states their benchmark figures are collected from user submitted data. r/lowendgaming. . Is Userbenchmark reliable? comments. Tom’s Hardware, TechSpot, Anandtech. And having a bias is one thing but he puts out benchmarking numbers that other reviewers are unable Oct 18, 2023 · UserBenchmark tests individual hardware components in isolation, without accounting for how different components interact within a system. The data is not reliable, since it includes underperforming and overclocked CPUs and GPUs, and their tests are also very unrealistic. /r/MCAT is a place for MCAT practice, questions, discussion, advice, social networking, news, study tips and more. See More cpubenchmark. Opendata Blender: GPU/CPU Ray-Tracing Performance comparison. Planning on building a computer but need some advice? This is the place to ask! /r/buildapc is a community-driven subreddit dedicated to custom PC assembly. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. "Within minutes of the first, pre-release, 7000 series results appearing on userbenchmark, AMD’s advanced marketing machinery declared a 20% victory over the 12900K whilst simultaneously slandering userbenchmark via hundreds of “news” outlets and thousands of supposedly disinterested twitter, reddit, forum and youtube accounts. r/FantasyPL is dedicated to all things FPL, the official fantasy game of the Premier League. I suspect mine is a 1GB model and that the 2GB model is more reliable, but the fact that the two aren't easily distinguishable is yet another reason to avoid buying it IMO. Aug 19, 2020 · I think you pretty much answered your own question with UserBenchmark, though. com is down for you too, the server might be overloaded or unreachable because of network problems, outages or a website maintenance is in progress. UserBenchmark: Troubleshooting also specs check ( easiest if you're helping some newbie since it also shows clocks and exact model names ). UserBenchmark is a terrible source for benchmarks, as they're not representative of actual performance. passmark and userbenchmark should be avoided at all costs. The most important reason people chose Passmark Performance on youtube if you search "userbenchmark" this is the third video. Requests Are Welcome In This Sub The 256GB Transcend SSD370 sports a Silicon Motion (SM2246EN) controller coupled with Micron 20nm synchronous MLC NAND. This comment has NOT been removed - this is just a notice. Its ok as a simple diagnostic if you accept that it has faults. " It really isn't. Always take Can I run it with a grain of salt. 33) has been blacklisted with activity code (19) at Sat Jan 11 00:25:51 GMT 2025. UserBenchmark is the subject of concerns over the accuracy and integrity of their benchmark and review process. If you want synthetic benchmark numbers look at 3DMark (Timespy is the most common test) for graphics cards and something like Cinebench, Geekbench, or Passmark for CPU Hello Is the page "www. net for a while now, gaging what to get for my next laptop. Wiki; GitHub; Discord Server; PortableApps Resource Page I have detected a link to UserBenchmark — UserBenchmark is a terrible source for benchmarks and comparing hardware, as the weighting system they use is not indicative of real world performance. I find the following suggestion by u/TheCrimsonDagger to be a better solution: whenever someone posts a link to userbenchmark (or another similarly biased website), automod would post a comment explaining that userbenchmark is known to have biased testing methodology and shouldn’t be used as a reliable source by itself. Mar 31, 2015 · Hello, is the site http://www. Someone can also run UserBenchmark with no OC, while their system is overheating, with their RAM at the default 2133Mhz speed while watching a 4K60fps YouTube video. I used to use userbenchmark before they changed their rating system, making multicore scores weigh almost nothing and then I learned that they weren't the most trustworthy TBH I've found both the sites extremely reliable for 10+ years. Jun 12, 2013 · PC component rating website 'UserBenchmark' faces a near-universal backlash from multiple DIY PC subreddits and its moderators. After that, the overclockers flocks in, and spoils the result I really wish they would update it so that it segments benchmarkers who run on stock speeds and OC-ed speed. For example, you can really see the stagnation in Intel chips by comparing the single-thread performance in the many refreshes of the 14nm architecture on userbenchmark. The MCAT (Medical College Admission Test) is offered by the AAMC and is a required exam for admission to medical schools in the USA and Canada. com - Identify the strongest components in your PC - See speed test results from other users - Compare your components to the current market leaders - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware Is notebookcheck. The organization that runs it also lies and accuses critics of being "anonymous call center shills". The controversie comes from the scoring to compate different products. I've detected a link to UserBenchmark. It's all user results, most are going to be overclocked or not at stock settings, could even be tainted results. Some people use UserBenchMark but it's known for having people cheat the system, as it uses data from user submission as a baseline, not an actual verified baseline tests that compares components. Userbenchmark is usfull for benchmarking your system and comparing it to other systems with the same hardware. Please know that they have been at the center of drama due to accusations of being biased towards certain brands, using outdated or nonsensical means to score products, as well as several other things that you should know. Sites sort of a mess. Secondly, the “review” section is so cherry-picked and inaccurate as it could be, always ditching AMD for obviously fake and biased reasons. Here's the link to the comparison I did: Userbenchmark is utterly useless and it has lost the prestige it gained a decade ago. I have an old PC that I consider upgrading the GPU of, and I've been hearing bad things about Userbenchmark so I googled Userbenchmark alternatives and found Novabench Userbenchmark was saying that my Core i5-4460 was better than 89-95% of other Core i5-4460 CPUs, now I ran Novabench, and it is saying that my CPU is only better than 39% of 88 votes, 54 comments. They use extremely flawed testing methodology that makes any comparisons, even apples-to-apples comparisons, somewhere between questionable and outright useless. I know Userbenchmark has a lot of data, but it's controversial. e. I have ran a benchmark and everything seems to be ok, but I was wondering is this program safe to use. ive heard its biased against AMD, so is it ok for comparing intel to intel or nvidia to nvidia? So, IMO, UserBenchmark is cool, but results are accurate for the first one or two weeks of a product release. There's no one benchmark that can give you the full picture. Userbenchmark has a history of downplaying AMD's strengths and even changing their overall performance rating to favor Intel. For example their FAQ page used to say this: "The effective CPU speed index measures performance with the following weights: 40% single-core, 58% quad-core and 2% multi-core. I haven't seen anyone on here reference it before. He borked it to the point where the data he was presenting was making older gen Intel CPUs sometimes look better than newer gen at one point. Thanks very much! I tried looking around for information, but it was very sparse. Phobos: AMD Ryzen 7 2700, 16GB 3000MHz DDR4, ASRock B450 Steel Legend, 8GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070, 2GB Nvidia GeForce GT 1030, 1TB Samsung SSD 980, 450W Corsair CXM, Corsair Carbide 175R, Windows 10 Pro Feb 20, 2023 · No. 167. Userbenchmark has bias in their weightings. 77. Reply reply Incorrect data is. Entries for mainstream CPUs and GPUs have a mini-review attached to them, and nearly all of them mention phrases I'm looking for a reliable one-stop-shop for hardware comparisons and benchmarks so I can quickly find what GPU, CPU, etc. AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. 14/2. There is a trial version of 3DMark but it doesn't include some of the more advanced tests. For non-tech people: hardware performance is measurable and objective. The reason for such we'll never know. com Based on 1,570,255 user benchmarks for the Seagate Barracuda 7200. His hatred is so intense, in fact, that his disinformation has some unintended friendly fire on Intel and Nvidia as well. This is a community Your IP (40. I've used it a few times to see how overclocking my GPU affects benchmark performance, and it works pretty well for that. Based on 1,004 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i5-14400 and the Core i7-14700, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,468 CPUs. Is there any bias like userbenchmark or is this fine? Archived post. This is an educational subreddit focused on scams. 1. The GTX 480 had 1,536MB of VRAM as opposed to 1,024MB, giving it a slight advantage there. In the question“What are the best tools for benchmarking a Windows PC?” Passmark Performance Test is ranked 4th while UserBenchmark is ranked 8th. Very reliable and detailed. : the benchmarks are reliable. Sucks that userbenchmark isn't reliable because its so easy to use and has some cool features but yeah. Two different resolutions. Aug 15, 2023 · Since, UserBenchmark doesn’t focus on productivity benchmark tests such as Premiere Pro encoding, V-Ray rendering, Davinci Resolve editing, Matlab, SolidWorks and 3Ds Max designing, you have to look for reviews elsewhere in YouTube or Reddit. Welcome to the UserBenchMark Portable Homepage! Here you will find resources and download links. Because its results are reliable and I've heard that Userbenchmark isn't reliable but like, wtf? I've mainly used Userbenchmark to get a quick comparison from generation to generation but I'm not even sure I should do that now. 14 MB/s is actually the highest 4K read speed I have seen to date on a 4TB drive. Two different storage types. Welcome to r/scams. The reports can be manipulated too much, resulting in highly inaccurate data overall. tar. Please know that they have been at the center of drama due to accusations of being biased towards certain brands, using outdated or nonsensical means to score produts, as well as several other things that you should know. net reliable? I've been using notebookcheck. Used to be a good reliable free benchmarking app, but now it's just a useless piece of crap that wants you to pay for it to bench your computer because 'They're server is full!', and yes, I've tried in different time spans and it's always "full", literally no server load is necessary for this piece of crap, just to transmit result, not paying 16$ to Oct 6, 2022 · so my question is can I use userbenchmark to buy GPU and other components ? are the samples in this website reliable and trustworthy? Sort by date Sort by votes Gam3r01 The HGST Deskstar NAS is one of the few NAS drives to feature a 7,200 RPM rotational speed. but matching capacities of consumer drives is too expensive. "I know Userbenchmark is not a reliable benchmark reviewer, but the data is still valuable to compare against other systems. you can find far more accurate cpu/gpu benchmarks everywhere else but you usually dont have the same "user friendlyness", thats why people use that site. com server responded on time, indicating that there are no current Userbenchmark. It is fairly small and quick to run through and get an idea if a part of your system is under performing relative to others with that same part have. If one site’s benchmarks consistently contradict ALL reputable, independent reviewers, that’s a major red flag. How reliable is UserBenchmark for GPU scores? Troubleshooting Hey!, I've already noticed the apparent bias that UserBenchmark seems to have against AMD CPUs (as I’ve been using userbenchmark to plan a part list for my PC, however, the opinions I’ve seen about the website are very mixed. com being completely biased against Techspot is another one that I have found reliable and thorough. Mar 6, 2016 · Userbenchmark is reliable but it's not a crystal ball. If Userbenchmark. The best benchmarks are those that come from what you're going to be doing directly, as opposed to synthetic benchmarks that just simulate workloads. The 89. There is no argument that will make them change their mind. I have a Pentuim Duel Core E2500 and a integrated Nvidia Geforce 9200SE. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Reply reply Userbenchmark could claim that what they said is so ridiculous no reasonable person would believe them and then screenshot this post or any other calling them a joke. Title. Oct 9, 2022 · Not a big deal IMO - UserBenchmark is not a reliable benchmarking tool. But in any case, you shouldn't really trust user-submitted benchmark scores anyway because the submitted scores are likely weighted towards overclocked systems anyway. Userbenchmark is great to compare your hardware with other people that use the exact same hardware. however, the performance difference percentage is so helpful and easy to use. He started presenting data in a manner that made AMD look worse years ago. userbenchmark, from what ive heard, shouldnt be trusted. Possibly could be the faster storage allowing for an increased benchmark. Home|About Me|Contact Me View on GitHub Download source (. Not really reliable. Only visit this site to make fun of them. it's always use case dependant. Userbenchmark is extremely easy and quick to run, and I would recommend it ONLY for comparing a computer to itself, as it is quite consistent. Jan 7, 2021 · UserBenchmark is a well-known meme in the tech community, notorious for its blatant bias, especially against certain brands. There's always edge cases where benchmark x is better than benchmark y. Harmony Mainnet supports thousands of nodes in multiple shards, producing blocks in a few seconds with instant finality. 2010 saw Nvidia's respone to ATi's wildly sucessful HD 5870. Can I Run it says I can't play a number of games like Blur, Cod 4, MW2, Burnout Paradise, etc. Could be wrong though. Average 3 years ago. For more information, see here - This comment has not been removed, this is just a notice. Nov 8, 2022 · Yes I use it as my main check for games. Average consistency The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Toshiba X300 4TB is 46. The interplay between CPU, GPU, memory, and storage can significantly impact overall performance, and this complex relationship is not always accurately captured by UserBenchmark's tests. There's very strict control over when you can report your benchmark. Gives consistent and reliable scores with percentile ranks for comparison Includes a dial and a graph to compare with others over the world or your own benchmarks or people with same component. In this subreddit: we roll our eyes and snicker at minimum system requirements. Though one to absolutely avoid is userbenchmark. When comparing Passmark Performance Test vs UserBenchmark, the Slant community recommends Passmark Performance Test for most people. Don’t use it. Two different OS and UI versions. I'm wondering how reliable their method of measuring performance is. com problems today. Edit - I'll add, in this particular case passmark gives lots of extra weight to the integer-performance where the FX-series notably shines far beyond their real-world use (there's a reason Float performance is used for most benchmarks). the best in terms of endurance and reliability are probably those intel optane drives. Because many of those figures you see on Userbenchmark are about as reliable as tossing random numbers in random. Reply reply Flying_Reinbeers UserBenchmark is the subject of concerns over the accuracy and integrity of their benchmark and review process. You can be biased in terms of things like the value single-core performance or the application and then there's whatever this is. Their findings do not typically match those of known reputable and trustworthy sources. Feb 19, 2021 · Due to growing criticism and widespread mistrust, citing UserBenchmark on various subreddits has pretty much been banned, with reputable threads r/Intel and r/Hardware even going so far as to ban any UserBenchmark user from posting or commenting on their subreddit, mostly because many self-proclaimed UserBenchmark users were either acting like Userbenchmark is a complete joke. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. Apr 25, 2022 · Even though UserBenchmark clearly shows when a part isn’t pulling its weight, it doesn’t do a great job of explaining the reasons why that may be. They then responded to criticism by calling everyone else an "army of shills". There is no good userbenchmark score because it uses flawed methods of "benchmarking," if you can even call it that. Is UserBenchmark a reliable source for comparing overall GPU and CPU performance? upvote No, not at all. It is our hope to be a wealth of knowledge for people wanting to educate themselves, find support, and discover ways to help a friend or loved one who may be a victim of a scam. Based on 702,912 user benchmarks for the Seagate Barracuda (2018) and the SkyHawk (2016), we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,015 HDDs. We don't have reliable prices for the GTX 980 Ti yet so a precise value rating isn't possible but as a card aimed at resolutions greater than 1080p it will struggle to match the GTX 970 for the vast majority of users. Is Userbenchmark reliable? Open I've always used Userbenchmark to compare hardware, but today i found this: https: //cpu Jan 12, 2022 · This comes from a misunderstanding of how Userbenchmark reports its results, Userbenchmark's poor documentation about these numbers, AND the fact that they update their benchmarks to be more difficult, on the fly. These sites are mainly for getting an idea on how fast one part is compared to another, not an end all be all to benchmarks. userbenchmark. Both of those GPUs are very very weak. There's literally Userbenchmark did however get to boost my ram a considerable amount so they did something good lol (still needs to burn for trashing on and) Is memtest86 reliable? - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark. It's also good enough at comparing stuff from a similar brand, but its tests can be a bit outdated. But beyond that it comes down to what you're doing. Far from reliable Used to be a good reliable benchmarking app. Look at sites that offer reviews with comprehensive benchmarks. What was Nvidia's respone? A literal furnace. If this has been done in error, please accept our apologies and copy this message into an email to support(at)userbenchmark. On userbenchmark the 580 is shown to be around 8% faster which falls into line according to what we know about the cards. It's great for troubleshooting. The only way you can know for sure is by finding benchmarks of both cards for CS:GO. The scores are explained on their site. Jul 28, 2019 · Userbenchmark's new scoring mechanism has stoked controversy in the enthusiast community. A Community Dedicated To Modded Android App Releases. How it works - Download and run UserBenchmark - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO I'm sorry, but if someone can read userbenchmark reviews and think that they are unbiased and reliable after that. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the Toshiba X300 4TB performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions. Our protocol has achieved secure and random state sharding. Userbenchmark ranks them at within 10% of each other meaning one will do better in some games and the other better in other games. Mar 27, 2020 · I don't know that it is widely adopted in the PC gamer/enthusiast community. With some exceptions, YouTube influencers are becoming the influenced by major corporations, all for the money. r/FantasyPL. In spite of being newer, having better manufacturing process, being more efficient, having access to ddr5 ram, and more cache overall; userbenchmark claims only a ~19% speed difference between these processors whereas functionally the 12th gen i3 is about 100% faster. I have a few questions about Userbenchmark. Userbenchmark specifically, the guy who owns the website hates AMD and a personal vendetta against them. All the negative reviews driven by corpies are additional proof to me that Userbenchmark is a most reliable website for choosing the right hardware. Apr 14, 2024 · UserBenchmark’s lack of timely updates diminishes its utility as a reliable source for assessing computer component performance. Dec 6, 2006 · Reddit users did notice Userbenchmark screwed with the weighting. org. Feb 17, 2024 · The other side of Userbenchmark is its infamous criticism toward AMD CPUs and GPUs. I do use both Passmark and 3DMark, both are far more reliable than userbenchmark but they're not free. | Read 21-24 Reviews out of 24 I've seen many mentions of userbenchmark. com" safe for testing your PC? I needs to download some *. is better (in general). Yet I can run these games like a dream on low settings. This does not even get into the main "reviewers" of CPUs and GPUs 'CPUPro' and 'GPUPro. Does their bias to Intel change the bench scores on the website or just the reviews? Is it reliable if I'm comparing 2 Intel CPUs or 2 AMD CPUs? Is their GPU benchmark biased? Is there a similar website to it that offers the same information in a similar format? Thanks. Glad this exists though Reply reply Harmony is a fast and open blockchain for decentralized applications. 6%. My antivirus did not pick up anything and people seem to say it is ok. UserBenchMark Portable is a tool that quickly benchmarks your PC. They are extremely biased towards Intel no matter how bad intel is or how good amd is currently. Userbenchmark sucks. DuckDuckGo is a private alternative to Google search, as well as free browsers for mobile & desktop devices. As always, please ensure you verify the information you read online before drawing conclusions or making purchases. Resources. , your forgot to enable XMP on your RAM). UserBenchmark is a disinformation campaign by 1 very sad, unstable man who has a hate boner for AMD. Take 3DMark, for example. Date of experience : November 06, 2024 How many stars would you give Userbenchmark? Join the 26 people who've already contributed. I'd say userbenchmark is good for comparing the same architecture to itself or past architectures to newer architectures as long as the processors have the same focus. At Compulove, we stay abreast of the latest developments in computer hardware and continuously update our benchmarks to reflect the current state of the industry. Not saying in the slightest it is the best but there are a few things from a far I have seen that could be why it still has some use. g. zip) Download source (. Anandtech is a pretty reliable source for english speakers and Computerbase would be my recommendation if you speak german. e. Read more here. com using our servers and the Userbenchmark. We have tried pinging Userbenchmark. The real problem with userbenchmark is that the data they provide is mostly incorrect or useless. I think passmark does extremely good cross generation and cross vendor benchmarks. Based on 5,047 user benchmarks for the Intel Core i7-13700H and the Core i7-13800H, we rank them both on effective speed and value for money against the best 1,468 CPUs. for the specific workloads that they are doing and if you look at each score by itself. that depends on what your priorities are. UserBenchmark is a well-known meme in the tech community, notorious for its blatant bias, especially against certain brands. It really comes down to the popularity of your specs. ' UserBenchmark is the subject of concerns over the accuracy and integrity of their benchmark and review process. 2 MB/s. Passmark benchmark software is the source for both those results sites. exe file to run on your pc Is this safe in terms of : isnt it a scam, some malware, virus etc is the site legit and i dont have to worry about downloading and running the exe testing file/program? Userbenchmark reliable? comments. Agreed, Kimovil was really useful when I was looking to buy a phone (ended up going for the F5) and one for a friend (got a Galaxy A54) it just has a lot of info at a glance, wes very useful to see the SoC (CPU) main sensor on the cameras, battery capacity, ram, storage but also all the existing versions of the phone and what I found also very useful was to see All the negative reviews driven by corpies are additional proof to me that Userbenchmark is a most reliable website for choosing the right hardware. You seem to be linking to or recommending the use of UserBenchMark for benchmarking or comparing hardware. No, regardless of obvious bias their test suite isn't reliable or valid even against itself or the same brand so it's basically useless. but any hardware review site that ranks hardware based on "overall performance" or "averages" is not going to be super accurate. It leaves horizontal lines on the screen reminiscent of VHS fuzz just in the desktop and I've even experienced the occasional black screen when waking up from sleep mode. gz) UserBenchMark Portable. Firstly, they've paid Google to sponsor them, hence always appearing after a search. Welcome to the official subreddit of the PC Master Race / PCMR! All PC-related content is welcome, including build help, tech support, and any doubt one might have about PC ownership. The only thing that site is useful for is diagnostic purposes. Why is userbenchmark not reliable? Question I hear people say that user benchmark is not reliable, but it seems to be well-made and pool/average their data accurately Oct 28, 2024 · UserBenchmark offers a free all-in-one suite that can be used to benchmark your CPU, GPU, SSD, HDD, RAM, and even USB to help you pick the best hardware for your needs. however, the overall score comparison is iffy at best. the "great" thing about userbenchmark was comparing your own system to comparable systems, especially in regards to non cpu/gpu stuff like drives. Go for it and feel safe. Youtube ( Gamers Nexus, etc ): CPU/GPU Gaming Performance. With peak sequential read/write speeds of 520/290 MBps and peak 4k read/write speeds of 29/116 the SSD370 has an effective speed which is amongst the bottom 25% of ~250GB drives. Aug 10, 2020 · Afaik, userbenchmark is biased towards Intel, so their benchmarks are calculated/made in such a way that favors Intel. Here is the perfect example. If you want to compare anything, best to check tech channels like GamersNexus for reviews and benchmarks. The software is built by a You seem to be linking to or recommending the use of UserBenchMark for benchmarking or comparing hardware. All in all, unreliable UserBenchmark is not a place to test your productivity machine. V-Ray Benchmark: Alternative GPU/CPU Ray-Tracing Performance comparison. Userbenchmark is useful for one thing - posting your test results here so that we can catch major errors that might be causing problems (i. well, not everything. com trustworthy inm regards: 1) Can their results be trusted? Are they correct and honest, and "trustworthy" (dont they use for example some bad Jan 9, 2021 · Benchmarks that share their testing methodology are the most reliable ones, so tech tubers like hardware unboxed and gamers nexus, who describe how their tests are carried out, will have the most accurate data. This says to me that it's likely more accurate. The problem with userbenchmark is that everyone else who uses it could be using it wrong. Unlike Chrome, DuckDuckGo browsers have privacy built-in with best-in-class tracker blocking that stop cookies & creepy ads that follow you around, & more. Passmark while a lot more reliable than userbenchmark, it's not really indictative of real world performance, more compute performance. Your experience matters. This is due to its inaccurate benchmark and rating system which misguided many unsuspecting readers, therefore ending not The #1 social media platform for MCAT advice. As an actual benchmark its not that great and individual benchmarking tools for parts are much better and reliable. Userbenchmark has such a comical basis he's actually got himself banned here on reddit from r/Intel because even Intel's social media team has determined his unfair bias in favor of them makes them look bad and they refuse to associate with him. If i remenber correctly once a i3 9400 got the better score than the ryzen 9 3950x which is a ridicouls claim. Mar 11, 2020 · Userbenchmark is highly unreliable, just forget about it. r/psychologystudents. I’ve liked it as it’s very easy to use (especially compared to going to see a 10 minute YouTube vid) but if the information is not trustworthy I won’t use it. Userbenchmark shouldn't really exist. now, if you search "userbenchmark reddit" on google the first page is: "userbenchmark should be banned" "is userbenchmark not reliable" "proof that userbenchmark is crap" "i knew userbenchmark was bad, but i didnt known it was this bad when it comes to amd shaming" Userbenchmark is not accurate. I would have rated it a 0 if I could but 1 star is the lowest score. It is not a reliable site. r/moddedandroidapps. 3% is how that CPU performed against Userbenchmark's standard test - this score is practically useless. Is this table from Lenovo a reliable The situation with UserBenchmark is stupid. There isn’t a good way to compare all hardware, so interpreting benchmarks from different reliable sources is the best we Jul 27, 2020 · I can run UserBenchmark on my PC, with a highly overclocked system, running very cool and with absolutely no background tasks. arguably making multicore performance a more reliable way to speed up a processor. Especially if you say they have a big ego on top. If you're looking for a reliable benchmarking utility go with 3Dmark. This relatively high rotational speed helps the 4TB Deskstar NAS achieve a 4k read/write speed of 1. We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. TL;DR: Tom’s Write the name of modern hardware components on post-it notes, place post-it notes on wall, throw shit at the wall and the post-it note with the most shit on it will be about as reliable, probably less shitty result as what you'll get from userbenchmark. and ofc its usually the UserBenchmark is the subject of concerns over the accuracy and integrity of their benchmark and review process. kyvosf qxjuu nwpp nqdtp hdnrzws lcs czjgn riodnq aclkm smvbp